Best physics with best graphics? How can they go wrong? I purchased AMS2 during a sale event but have been waiting for the official 1.0 release before driving it. When Reiza Studios announced that Automobilista 2 would be using the Madness engine, I got pretty excited. I found that it was really car dependent with some vehicles excellent and others miserable. But hardcore sim racers generally feel that PCARS is a little on the arcade side and PCARS2 is a lot on the arcade side. If you want to see how gorgeous a car simulation can be, PCARS and its successor PCARS2 are at the top of the heap. Project CARS is well known for its Madness engine. But if AC and rF2 didn’t exist, I’d be very happy with AMS. I prefer (a) tracks I may visit in real life (b) rally courses. Personally, I don’t use it as often as AC or rF2 because of the track collection. Maybe that’s because of its obscure car and track collection? Or maybe advertising? In any case, people who like realistic sims tend to have AMS in their software library. Honestly, it’s not popular compared to just about any other platform. It’s not very popular compared to iRacing or Assetto Corsa. Among sim racing enthusiasts, Automobilista (AMS) is well respected for its vehicle dynamics.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |